Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Messages about other areas of TRIUS expertise (Energy, Radiation Safety, Risk,..) and Technology, in general...
Post Reply
User avatar
HowardE
Senior User
Senior User
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:07 pm

Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Post by HowardE »

I know that someone posted some report about low radiation not being too harmful, but there are other studies that concluded otherwise. Take a look at this one.
Attachments
Diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased chromosome translocations - evidence from three studies.pdf
(682.1 KiB) Downloaded 849 times
Anger is a good motivator!
User avatar
Helen22
Senior User
Senior User
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:59 pm

Re: Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Post by Helen22 »

HowardE wrote:I know that someone posted some report about low radiation not being too harmful, but there are other studies that concluded otherwise. Take a look at this one.
Hard to see how this report relates to the one about the new research on low levels of radiation! Also, remember that the end of the day, these are just reports. One needs to read them and try to draw their own conclusions.
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler" - A. Einstein
User avatar
HowardE
Senior User
Senior User
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:07 pm

Re: Low Radiation Still Harmfull

Post by HowardE »

You may want to take a look at these reports, before you write off anything that doesn't fit your pre-conceived notions. Low Radiation doses may be MORE harmful.

http://enenews.com/epidemiology-scienti ... human-race


http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/ ... on-puzzle/

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-a ... 1d63z.html
Anger is a good motivator!
Post Reply